Journal
SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL INCLUDED IN THE LIST
OF THE HIGHER ATTESTATION COMMISSION
UNDER THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
AND SCIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
RU EN
ISSN 2782-4519 (Print) 16+
ISSN 2949-5962 (Online)
Search
About
  • About Journal
  • History
  • Indexing
  • Open Access
  • Editorial Ethics and Policy
  • Reviewing
  • Partners
News
Management
  • Editor-in-Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Contacts
Author Center
  • Legal Principles for the Preparation and Publication of Manuscripts
  • Manuscript Submission
  • License Agreement
  • Submit a Manuscript
Issues
  • Volumes
  • All articles
  • Authors
    Journal
    Menu  
    • About
      • About Journal
      • History
      • Indexing
      • Open Access
      • Editorial Ethics and Policy
      • Reviewing
      • Partners
    • News
    • Management
      • Editor-in-Chief
      • Editorial Board
      • Contacts
    • Author Center
      • Legal Principles for the Preparation and Publication of Manuscripts
      • Manuscript Submission
      • License Agreement
      • Submit a Manuscript
    • Issues
      • Volumes
      • All articles
      • Authors
    Journal
    Search
    ISSN 2782-4519 (Print) 16+
    ISSN 2949-5962 (Online)
    • About
      • Назад
      • About
      • About Journal
      • History
      • Indexing
      • Open Access
      • Editorial Ethics and Policy
      • Reviewing
      • Partners
    • News
    • Management
      • Назад
      • Management
      • Editor-in-Chief
      • Editorial Board
      • Contacts
    • Author Center
      • Назад
      • Author Center
      • Legal Principles for the Preparation and Publication of Manuscripts
      • Manuscript Submission
      • License Agreement
      • Submit a Manuscript
    • Issues
      • Назад
      • Issues
      • Volumes
      • All articles
      • Authors
    Moscow, Prospekt Marshala Jukova, d.78, korp.2
    journal@msbook.ru
    MAIN VOLUMES ARTICLES AUTHORS
    • Main
    • Issues
    • All articles
    • All articles
    • Vogt F., Hauser B., Stebler R., Rechsteiner K., Urech C. Learning through Play – Pedagogy and Learning Outcomes in Early Childhood Mathematics

    Vogt F., Hauser B., Stebler R., Rechsteiner K., Urech C. Learning through Play – Pedagogy and Learning Outcomes in Early Childhood Mathematics

    Vogt F., Hauser B., Stebler R., Rechsteiner K., Urech C. Learning through Play – Pedagogy and Learning Outcomes in Early Childhood Mathematics
    Download PDF
    Keywords: early childhood education mathematics play quantitynumber-competencies kindergarten games pedagogy
    To cite this article:
    Vogt F., Hauser B., Stebler R., Rechsteiner K., Urech C. Learning through play – pedagogy and learning outcomes in early childhood mathematics. Preschool Education Today. 3:13, 66–78 (in Russian)

    This work is licensed under a Сreative Commons Atribiution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

    2019, 3
    Franziska Vogt
    Institute for Research in Teaching and Learning, University of Education St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Christa Urech
    Institute for Research in Teaching and Learning, University of Education St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Rita Stebler
    Institute of Education Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Karin Rechsteiner
    Institute for Research in Teaching and Learning, University of Education St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Bernhard Hauser
    Institute for Research in Teaching and Learning, University of Education St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Abstract

    Whilst research underlines the importance of early mathematics in kindergarten, practitioners need effective and innovative approaches to pedagogy. Currently, very different approaches are deployed from an instructional, educator-led approach based on training programmes to a play-based approach. This intervention study examines the effects on the mathematical competency of these two pedagogies. Thirty-five kindergarten educators and 324 six-year-old children were randomly assigned to either a training programme, a play-based approach with card and board games or to the control group. Educators’ views on the interventions were gathered in semi-structured interviews. The results indicate higher learning gains overall for the play-based approach. Differentiated effects were found as tendencies: children with low competencies tend to gain more from training programmes compared to no intervention; children with high competencies gain more from the play-based approach than the training. Educators evaluated the play-based intervention with card and board games as better suited to children’s diverse needs.
    Current View
    Current View

    Enter the password to open this PDF file:

    File name:

    -

    File size:

    -

    Title:

    -

    Author:

    -

    Subject:

    -

    Keywords:

    -

    Creation Date:

    -

    Modification Date:

    -

    Creator:

    -

    PDF Producer:

    -

    PDF Version:

    -

    Page Count:

    -

    Preparing document for printing...
    0%

    References

    1.      Anders, Y., and H.-G. Rossbach. 2015. “Preschool Teachers’ Sensitivity to Mathematics in Children’s Play: The Influence of Math-Related School Experiences, Emotional Attitudes, and Pedagogical Beliefs.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 29 (3): 305–322. doi:10.1080/02568543.2015.1040564.

    2.      Anders, Y., H. G. Rossbach, S. Weinert, S. Ebert, S. Kuger, S. Lehrl, and J. von Maurice. 2012. “Home and Preschool Learning Environments and their Relations to the Development of Early Numeracy Skills.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 27 (2): 231–244.

    3.      Benz, C. 2012. “Attitudes of Kindergarten Educators about Math.” Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 33 (2): 203–232.

    4.      Bergen, D. 2015. “Psychological Approaches to the Study of Play.” American Journal of Play 7 (2):51–69.

    5.      Bodrova, E. 2008. “Make-Believe Play Versus Academic Skills: A Vygotskian Approach to Today’s Dilemma of Early Childhood Education.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 16 (3): 357–369.

    6.      Brown, E. T. 2005. “The Influence of Teachers’ Efficacy and Beliefs Regarding Mathematics Instruction in the Early Childhood Classroom.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 26 (3): 239–257.

    7.      Chen, J. Q., J. McCray, M. Adams, and C. Leow. 2014. “A Survey Study of Early Childhood Teachers’ Beliefs and Confidence about Teaching Early Math.” Early Childhood Education Journal 42 (6): 367–377. doi:10.1007/s10643-013-0619-0.

    8.      Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    9.      Dornheim, D. 2008. Prädiktion von Rechenleistung und Rechenschwäche: Der Beitrag von Zahlen-Vorwissen und allgemein-kognitiven Fähigkeiten. Berlin: Logos.

    10.    Duncan, G. J., C. J. Dowsett, A. Claessens, K. Magnuson, A. C. Huston, P. Klebanov, L. S. Pagani,et al. 2007. “School Readiness and Later Achievement.” Developmental Psychology 43 (6): 1428–1446.

    11.    Engel, M., A. Claessens, T. Watts, and G. Farkas. 2016. “Mathematics Content Coverage and Student Learning in Kindergarten.” Educational Researcher 45 (5): 293–300.

    12.    Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    13.    Garrote, A., E. Moser Opitz, and C. Ratz. 2015. “Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit dem Förderschwerpunkt geistige Entwicklung. Eine Querschnittstudie.” Empirische Sonderpädagogik 7 (1): 24–40.

    14.    Gasteiger, H. 2015. “Early Mathematics in Play Situations: Continuity of Learning.” In Mathematics and Transition to School: International Perspectives, edited by B. Perry, A. Gervasoni, and A. MacDonald, 255–272. Singapore: Springer.

    15.    Gasteiger, H., A. Obersteiner, and K. Reiss. 2015. “Formal and Informal Learning Environments: Using Games to Support Early Numeracy.” In Describing and Studying Domain-Specific Serious Games, edited by J. Torbeyns, E. Lehtinen, and J. Elen, 231–250. Cham: Springer.

    16.    Gross, C., and H. G. Rossbach. 2011. “Frühpädagogik.” In Empirische Bildungsforschung. Gegenstandsbereiche, edited by H. Reinders, H. Ditton, C. Gräsel, and B. Gniewosz, 75–86. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    17.    Grüssing, M., and A. Peter-Koop. 2008. “Effekte vorschulischer mathematischer Förderung am Ende des ersten Schuljahres: Erste Befunde einer Längsschnittstudie.” Zeitschrift für Grundschulforschung 1 (1): 65–81.

    18.    Hauser, B. 2005. “Das Spiel als Lernmodus: Unter Druck von Verschulung - im Lichte der neueren Forschung.” In Bildung 4- bis 8-jähriger Kinder, edited by T. Guldimann, and B. Hauser, 143–168. Münster: Waxmann.

    19.    Hauser, B., E. Rathgeb-Schnierer, R. Stebler, and F. Vogt, eds. 2015. Mehr ist mehr. Mathematische Frühförderung mit Regelspielen. Seelze: Klett/Kallmayer.

    20.    Hauser, B., F. Vogt, R. Stebler, and K. Rechsteiner. 2014. “Förderung früher mathematischer Kompetenzen.” Frühe Bildung 3 (3): 139–145.

    21.    Jörns, C., K. Schuchardt, D. Grube, and C. Mähler. 2014. “Spielorientierte Förderung numerischer Kompetenzen im Vorschulalter und deren Eignung zur Prävention von Rechenschwierigkeiten.” Empirische Sonderpädagogik 2014 (3): 243–259.

    22.    Kamii, C., and Y. Kato. 2005. “Fostering the Development of Logico-Mathematical Thinking in a Card Game at Ages 5–6.” Early Education and Development 16 (3): 367–384. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1603_4.

    23.    Krajewski, K. 2003. Vorhersage von Rechenschwäche in der Grundschule. Hamburg: Kovac.

    24.    Krajewski, K., G. Nieding, and W. Schneider. 2007. Mengen, zählen, Zahlen: Die Welt der Mathematik verstehen (MZZ). Berlin: Cornelsen.

    25.    Krajewski, K., G. Nieding, and W. Schneider. 2008. “Kurz- und langfristige Effekte mathematischer Frühförderung im Kindergarten durch das Programm ‘Mengen, zählen, Zahlen’.” Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie 40 (3): 135–146.

    26.    Krajewski, K., and W. Schneider. 2009. “Exploring the Impact of Phonological Awareness, Visual–Spatial Working Memory, and Preschool Quantity–Number Competencies on Mathematics Achievement in Elementary School: Findings from a 3-Year Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 103 (4): 516–531.

    27.    Kruse, J. 2015. Qualitative Interviewforschung. Weinheim: Juventa.

    28.    Kuckartz, U. 2010. Einführung in die computergestützte Analyse qualitativer Daten. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    29.    Lee, J. S., and H. P. Ginsburg. 2009. “Early Childhood Teachers’ Misconceptions about Mathematics Education for Young Children in the United States.” Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 34 (4): 37–45.

    30.    Link, M., F. Vogt, and B. Hauser. 2017. “Überzeugungen von Kindergartenlehrpersonen zur mathematischen Förderung im Kindergarten: Schweiz, Deutschland und Österreich im Vergleich.” Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung 35 (3): 440–458.

    31.    McCray, J. S., and J.-Q. Chen. 2012. “Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Preschool Mathematics: Construct Validity of a New Teacher Interview.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 26 (3): 291–307. doi:10.1080/02568543.2012.685123.

    32.    Moser, U., and N. Bayer. 2010. 4 bis 8. Schlussbericht der summativen Evaluation. Lernfortschrittte vom Eintritt in die Eingangsstufe bis zum Ende der 3. Klasse der Primarschule. Bern: Schulverlag plus.

    33.    Moser, U., and S. Berweger. 2007. Wortgewandt & zahlenstark. Lern- und Entwicklungsstand bei 4-bis 6-Jährigen. St. Gallen: interkantonale Lehrmittelzentrale.

    34.    Moser Opitz, E. 2001. Zählen, Zahlbegriff, Rechnen. Theoretische Grundlagen und eine empirische Untersuchung zum mathematischen Erstunterricht in Sonderklassen. Bern: Paul Haupt.

    35.    Oppermann, E., Y. Anders, and A. Hachfeld. 2016. “The Influence of Preschool Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Mathematical Ability Beliefs on their Sensitivity to Mathematics in Children’s Play.” Teaching and Teacher Education 58: 174–184.

    36.    Ramani, G. B., and R. S. Siegler. 2008. “Promoting Broad and Stable Improvements in Low-Income Children’s Numerical Knowledge Through Playing Number Board Games.” Child Development 79 (2): 375–394.

    37.    Sarama, J., and D. H. Clements. 2009. Early Childhood Mathematics Education Research: Learning Trajectories for Young Children. New York: Routledge.

    38.    Schuler, S. 2008. “Was können Mathematikmaterialien im Kindergarten leisten? - Kriterien für eine gezielte Bewertung.” In Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2008, edited by Eva Vásárhelyi. Hildesheim: Franzbecker.

    39.    Schuler, S. 2013. Mathematische Bildung im Kindergarten in formal offenen Situationen – eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von Spielen zum Erwerb des Zahlbegriffs. Münster: Waxmann.

    40.    Singer, E. 2013. “Play and Playfulness, Basic Features of Early Childhood Education.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 21 (2): 172–184.

    41.    Sonnenschein, S., and C. Galindo. 2015. “Race/Ethnicity and Early Mathematics Skills: Relations between Home, Classroom, and Mathematics Achievement.” Journal of Educational Research 108 (4): 261–277.

    42.    Stebler, R., F. Vogt, I. Wolf, B. Hauser, and K. Rechsteiner. 2013. “Play-Based Mathematics in Kindergarten. A Video Analysis of Children’s Mathematical Behaviour While Playing a Board Game in Small Groups.” Journal für Mathematik Didaktik 34 (2): 149–175.

    43.    Thiel, O. 2010. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Mathematics in Early Childhood Education.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 18 (1): 105–115.

    44.    Vanden Heuvel-Panhuizen,M. 1995. “Leistungsmessung im aktiv-entdeckendenMathematikunterricht.” In Am Rande der Schrift. Zwischen Sprachenvielfalt und Analphabetismus, edited by H. Brügelmann, H. Balhorn, and I. Füssenich, 87–107. Lengwil am Bodensee: Libelle. van Oers, B. 2010. “Emergent Mathematical Thinking in the Context of Play.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 74 (1): 23–37.

    45.    Vogt, F., and K. Rechsteiner. 2015. “Regelspiele entwickeln.” In Mehr ist mehr. Mathematische Frühförderung mit Regelspielen, edited by B. Hauser, E. Rathgeb-Schnierer, R. Stebler, and F. Vogt, 46–55. Seelze: Klett/Kallmayer.

    46.    Vu, J. A., M. Han, and M. J. Buell. 2015. “The Effects of In-Service Training on Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices in Children’s Play.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 23 (4): 444–460.

    47.    Weisberg, D. S., K. Hirsh-Pasek, and R. M. Golinkoff. 2013. “Guided Play: Where Curricular Goals Meet a Playful Pedagogy.” Mind, Brain, and Education 7 (2): 104–112.

    48.    Weisberg, D. S., A. K. Kittredge, K. Hirsh-Pasek, R. M. Golinkoff, and D. Klahr. 2015. “Making Play Work for Education.” Phi Delta Kappan 96 (8): 8–13.

    49.    Weiss, R. H., R. B. Cattell, and J. Osterland. 1997. CFT 1. Grundintelligenztest Skala 1. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    50.    Wood, E. 2009. “Conceptualising a Pedagogy of Play: International Perspectives from Theory, Policy and Practice.” In From Children to Red Hatters: Divers Images and Issues of Play, edited by D. Kuschner, 166–190. Lanham: University Press of America Inc.

    51.    Wullschleger, A., and R. Stebler. 2016. “Individuelle mathematikbezogene Lernunterstützung bei Regelspielen zur Förderung früher Mengen-Zahlen-Kompetenzen im Kindergarten.” In Perspektiven mathematischer Bildung im Übergang vom Kindergarten zur Grundschule, edited by S. Schuler, C. Streit, and G. Wittmann, 171–186. Berlin: Springer Spektrum.

    Выберите один из подарков
    Выберите один из товаров, чтобы получить подарок
    Journal "Preschool Education Today"
    © 2007 - 2026. Active link en.sdo-journal.ru required.
    User agreement

    ABOUT
    ABOUT
    About
    Editorial Board
    News
    Contacts
    ISSUES
    ISSUES
    All articles
    Volumes
    Authors
    AUTHOR CENTER
    AUTHOR CENTER
    For Authors