Cand. Sci. (Pedagogy), Associate Professor at the Department of English and Professional Communication of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation
Background. A successful transition from preschool to primary school education is determined not so much by cognitive readiness as by the child’s social and personal readiness: the ability to self-regulate, engage in constructive interaction within a group, and fulfill new social roles. At this stage, social skills become a key resource for school adaptation. However, the expectations of adults (family and school) may diverge, and the subjective assessment of a child’s skill development may not meet the level of required standards.
Objective. To conduct a comparative analysis of the importance ratings of social skills by parents and primary school teachers; to identify the skills perceived by parents as least developed; to establish which skills necessary for school are most often insufficiently developed in children at the start of their education.
Sample. The study involved 80 primary school teachers (assessing skill importance) and two groups of parents: 510 individuals assessed the importance of skills, and 1,269 individuals assessed the level of their child’s skill development.
Methods. A cross-sectional, multi-informant survey was conducted. Skill importance was rated on a 1–5 scale (5 – “very important”), and skill development was rated on a 1–5 scale (5 – “describes the child extremely accurately”). The analysis included descriptive statistics; group comparisons using Welch’s t-test and effect size estimates (Cohen’s d); Spearman’s correlation analysis (r); calculation of the difference (imbalance) between importance and development levels; identification of “critical zones” based on importance-performance analysis (IPA).
Results. Teachers, on average, rated social skills as more important (M=3.96) than parents did (M=3.87), with statistically significant differences found for 15 out of 18 skills. The greatest discrepancies in priorities were identified for emotional regulation and responsibility for personal belongings (higher among teachers), as well as for the ability to ask clarifying questions, express needs, and demonstrate learning motivation (higher among parents). According to parental assessments, the least developed skills in children are emotional regulation (M=3.03), persistence (M=3.36), and adaptability (M=3.40). The maximum gap between high importance and low development, noted by both groups, was recorded for the skill of emotional regulation. Common “critical zones” for both parents and teachers were the skills of peaceful conflict resolution and active listening.
Conclusions. The results emphasize the need to enhance practices in preschool age aimed at developing self-regulation, resilience to difficulties, and skills of constructive interaction. The discrepancies between school and family expectations require not merely informing parents but jointly designing the content of educational continuity. Preschool institutions can initiate dialogue with primary school teachers, including through joint diagnostic and preventive measures.
Background. Against the backdrop of rapid socio‑cultural change, the development of social competence in preschool children has become a key task of education. Despite broad recognition of its importance, empirical data indicate a low level of social competence in many children, which predicts later difficulties with adaptation and learning. This creates the need to analyse existing barriers and practices among the primary agents of socialisation—parents and educators.
Objective. To identify and compare parents’ and preschool teachers’ assessments, practices and perceived barriers in developing preschoolers’ social competence, in order to outline directions for optimising their collaborative efforts.
Sample. The study involved 178 parents of preschool children and 57 teachers from preschool educational institutions in Yuzhno‑Sakhalinsk.
Methods. The study was conducted as a cross‑sectional, multi‑informant survey. A specially designed questionnaire was used; to monitor data validity, it included fictitious, non‑existent methods.
Results. Parents and teachers showed a high degree of agreement in identifying the most difficult components of social competence: “anticipating the consequences of one’s actions”, “taking account of other people’s feelings” and “admitting rule‑breaking and correcting one’s behaviour”. This convergence reflects the objective difficulty of fostering metacognitive and reflective functions. At the same time, there were marked differences in the practical toolbox. Teachers actively employ structured techniques (role play with explicit rules – 72.6%, peer mediation and social stories – 47.4% each), whereas parents more often use emotion coaching (17.2% versus 5.3% among teachers), which can be explained by differences in interaction contexts. A key finding was the documented gap between declared knowledge and actual behaviour: 25.9% of parents and 18.1% of teachers reported using non‑existent methods, and 46.6% of parents and 26.3% of teachers chose ineffective strategies at least once in scenario‑based tasks. This points to insufficient operational competence and susceptibility to “pseudo‑scientific” rhetoric.
Conclusions. There is an objective consensus between parents and teachers regarding the core difficulties in developing preschoolers’ social competence. However, coordination of efforts between family and preschool institutions is hampered by differences in methodological resources and by the gap between declarative knowledge and everyday practice. To increase the effectiveness of work in this area, targeted measures are needed to provide methodological support for parents and to adapt evidence‑based practices (such as emotion coaching) to the realities of preschool groups.