Ringblom N. And the Dog... Jagade Bort the Cat: on Some Peculiarities of the Narratives of Bilingual Children in Sweden
This work is licensed under a Сreative Commons Atribiution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Abstract
Relevance. Research on the narratives of bilingual children is extremely important, as it shows the child’s full linguistic competence, which in turn will allow teachers and educators to choose the appropriate program.
The purpose of this article is to analyze the narratives of Russian-Swedish billing children. The author examines both mistakes (or “innovations”) and strategies that are used by children with a lack of lexical and / or grammatical means. An attempt will also be made to explain the cause of the observed phenomena.
Description of the research progress. The study involved 25 Russian-Swedish bilingual’s children aged from 4.5 years to 9.2 years. The material for this study was collected using a specially developed tool for collecting narratives Litmus MAIN (The Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives). In addition to storytelling from pictures, spontaneous speech data and ethnolinguistic observations were collected.
Results. The study showed that many children were unfamiliar with the Russian equivalent of Swedish words and often used gestures when they did not know the word. Swedish was often used for metalinguistic comments and questions. Children were prone to lexical innovation and changing the meaning of words. They often mixed synonyms or lexical units close in meaning or sound. Children with weak Russian language had cases of transfer, as well as the following grammatical errors: incorrect case endings, mistakes in choosing the verb gender, the use of an incorrect preposition and case form, errors in using an accusative instead of a locative and errors in the form of a verb.
Conclusion. Considering the features of children’s narratives, the author shows how the lack of input and dominant language affects their stories. Since language acquisition in Sweden takes place in a specific context, the input is often limited to situations that the child encounters in daily life. In this regard, parents and teachers of their native language need to find more opportunities to practice the Russian language. It is necessary to create language situations in which children will want to talk about what happened to them. It is important for parents and teachers to try to motivate the child to tell it in Russian, to find time to play together, listen to the child, engage in joint activities and help find lexical means to express their thoughts.
References
1. Clark E.V. The Principal of contrast: A constraint of acquisition // Mechanisms of acquisition. NJ: Hillsdale, 1987. P. 1–33.
2. Gagarina N., Klop D., Kunnari S., Tantele K., Välimaa T., Balčiūnienė I., Bohnacker U., Walters J. Assessment of Narrative Abilities in Bilingual Children // Assessing Multilingual Children. Disentangling Bilingualism from Language Impairment / Armon-Lotem Sh., de Jong J., Meir N. (Eds.). Assessing Multilingual Children. Multilingual Matters. Bristol – Buffalo – Toronto, 2015. P. 243–276.
3. Gagarina N., Klop D., Kunnari S., Tantele K., Välimaa T., Balčiūnienė I., Walters J. MAIN: Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives. ZAS papers in Linguistics, 56 (2012).
4. Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
5. Haman E., Luniewska M., Pomiechowska B. Designing cross-linguistic lexical tasks (CLTs) for bilingual preschool children // Methods for assessing multilingual children: disentangling bilingualism from Language Impairment / S. Armon-Lotem, N. Meir, J. de Jong (Eds.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2015. P. 196–240.
6. Karpava, S., Ringblom, N., Zabrodskaja, A. (2020). A Look at the Translanguaging Space of Russian-speaking Families in Cyprus, Estonia and Sweden: On the Possible interrelationship between Family Language Policy and Linguistic Landscape. In: Lydia Sciriha (Ed.). Comparative Studies in Bilingualism and Bilingual Education. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 77-99. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/comparative-studies-in-bilingualism-and-bilingual-education
7. MacWhinney B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 206 p.
8. McCabe A. Chameleon readers: Teaching children to appreciate all kinds of good stories. NY: McGraw, 1996. 204 p.
9. Montrul S., Foote R., Perpiñán S. Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition // Language Learning. 2008. Vol. 58. N 3. P. 503–553.
10. Otwinowska-Kasztelanic, A, Meir, N, Karpava, S, Ringblom, N.& La Morgia, F. (2019). Language and literacy transmission in heritage language: evidence from Russian-speaking families in Cyprus, Ireland, Israel and Sweden. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 1–26.
11. Parkvall, M. (2015). Sveriges sprеk i siffror [Swedish in Numbers]. Sprеkrеdet. Morfem.
12. Pearson B.Z. Assessing lexical development in bilingual babies and toddlers // International Journal of Bilingualism. 1998. Vol. 2. P. 347–372.
13. Polinsky M., Kagan O. Heritage languages in the wild and in the classroom // Language and Linguistics Compass. 2007. Vol. 1. N.5. P. 368–395.
14. Ringblom N. The emergence of a new variety of Russian in a language contact situation // Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies / K. Braunmüller, Chr. Gabriel (Eds.). Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 2012. P. 63–80.
15. Ringblom N. The acquisition of Russian in a language contact situation: A case study of a bilingual child in Sweden. (Doctoral dissertation). Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, 2012. 276 p.
16. Ringblom, N. & Dobrova, G. (2019). Holistic Constructions in Heritage Russian and Russian as a Second Language: Divergence or Delay?. Scando-Slavica, 65:1, 94–106.
17. Roelofs, A. (2008). Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34: 353–68.