Toy preferences among 3-to-4-year-old children: The impact of socio-demographic factors and developmental characteristics
This work is licensed under a Сreative Commons Atribiution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Abstract
Background. Today’s common typologies and categories of children’s toys are mainly decided by the manufacturers and retailers of children’s products. Such categorizations are not based on a theoretical understanding of child development and therefore cannot provide information about the opportunities that toys provide for the young.
Objective. This study proposed three criteria for categorizing toys based on the cultural-historical approach: their degree of realism; their degree of anthropomorphism; and their degree of detail. These criteria were chosen as a result of an analysis of theoretical works carried out in the framework of cultural-historical approach.
Design. The proposed criteria were tested through an experiment measuring children’s toy preferences. The participants were 129 children of ages 3-4 years. Experimental data confirmed that most children do prefer realistic and detailed toys rather than those with fewer of these properties. The contribution of socio-demographic factors and the children’s individual developmental indicators to their toy preference was also analyzed.
Results. The study revealed that among various socio-demographic factors, only the child’s gender and the number of siblings in the family acted as significant predictors for the toy preferences. None of child’s developmental characteristics (non-verbal intelligence, executive functions, and emotional understanding) were found to be significant predictors of preference for particular toys.
Conclusions. The assumption that toys can be assessed in terms of their realism and degree of detail found empirical support. The results of this study may be useful in designing further research and in the practical issue of toy selection for children age 3-4 years.
References
Ban, M., Uchiyama, I. (2022). Developmental changes in toy preferences during pretend play in toddlerhood. Early Child Development and Care, 192(7), 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1838497
Bondi, D., Bondi, D. (2021). Free play or not free play: an interdisciplinary approach to deal with paradoxes. Creativity Research Journal, 33(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1833543
Chichinina, E.A., Gavrilova, M.N. (2022). Growth of executive functions in preschool-age children during the COVID-19 lockdown: Empirical evidence. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 15(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0209
Clark, E. (2007). The real toy story: Inside the ruthless battle for America’s youngest consumers. Simon and Schuster.
Colliver, Y., Veraksa, N. (2021). Vygotsky’s contributions to understanding emotional development through early childhood play. In: The Influence of Theorists and Pioneers on Early Childhood Education (pp. 38–52). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120216-5
Davis, J.T.M., Hines, M. (2020). How large are gender differences in toy preferences? A systematic review and meta-analysis of toy preference research. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(2), 373–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01624-7
Doebel, S., Lillard, A.S. (n.d.). Running head: play and executive function.
Downs, A.C. (1983). Letters to Santa Claus: Elementary school-age children’s sex-typed toy preferences in a natural setting. Sex Roles, 9, 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289620
Elkonin, D.B. (2005). Chapter 2: On the historical origin of role play. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 43(1), 49–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2005.11059243
Fagot, B.I., Patterson, G.R. (1969). An in vivo analysis of reinforcing contingencies for sex-role behaviors in the preschool child. Developmental Psychology, 1(5), 563. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027965
Fleer, M. (2022). How conceptual PlayWorlds create different conditions for children’s development across cultural age periods – a programmatic study overview. New Ideas in Child and Educational Psychology, 2, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.11621/nicep.2022.0201
Fleer, M., Veresov, N., Walker, S. (2019). Playworlds and executive functions in children: Theorising with the cultural-historical analytical lenses. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09495-2
Francis, B. (2010). Gender, toys and learning. Oxford Review of Education, 36(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054981003732278
Guirguis, R. (2018). Should we let them play? Three key benefits of play to improve early childhood programs. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.61.43.49
Hassett, J.M., Siebert, E.R., Wallen, K. (2008). Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences parallel those of children. Hormones and Behavior, 54(3), 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.03.008
Howard, J., Miles, G.E., Rees-Davies, L., Bertenshaw, E.J. (2017). Play in middle childhood: Everyday play behaviour and associated emotions. Children and Society, 31(5), 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12208
Jadva, V., Hines, M., Golombok, S. (2010). Infants’ preferences for toys, colors, and shapes: Sex differences and similarities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1261–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9618-z
Kelly, R., Dissanayake, C., Ihsen, E., Hammond, S. (2011). The relationship between symbolic play and executive function in young children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(2), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911103600204
Korkman, M., Kirk, U., Kemp, S. (2007). Nepsy-II. Administrative manual. Pearson, San Antonio.
Kudrowitz, B.M., Wallace, D.R. (2010). The play pyramid: A play classification and ideation tool for toy design. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 3(1), 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2010.030492
Lillard, A.S. (2017). Why Do the Children (Pretend) Play? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(11), 826–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.08.001
Liu, L., Escudero, P., Quattropani, C., Robbins, R.A. (2020). Factors affecting infant toy preferences: Age, gender, experience, motor development, and parental attitude. Infancy, 25(5), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12352
Mathieson, K., Banerjee, R. (2011). Peer play, emotion understanding, and socio-moral explanation: The role of gender. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2010.02020.x
Mertala, P., Karikoski, H., Tähtinen, L., Sarenius, V.M. (2016). The value of toys: 6-to-8-year-old children’s toy preferences and the functional analysis of popular toys. International Journal of Play, 5(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2016.1147291
Nelson, A. (2005). Children’s toy collections in Sweden – A less gender-typed country? Sex Roles, 52, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1196-5
Nicolopoulou, A., Cortina, K.S., Ilgaz, H., Cates, C.B., de Sá, A.B. (2015). Using a narrative- and play-based activity to promote low-income preschoolers’ oral language, emergent literacy, and social competence. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 31, 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.01.006
Pasterski, V.L., Geffner, M.E., Brain, C., Hindmarsh, P., Brook, C., Hines, M. (2005). Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toy play in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development, 76(1), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00843.x
Platje, E., Huijbregts, S.C.J., van Goozen, S.H.M., Popma, A., Cima, M., Swaab, H.J.T. (2018). Executive functioning, reward / punishment sensitivity, and conduct problems in boys with callous-unemotional traits. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(13), 4008–4023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18758897
Pons, F., Harris, P. (2000). Test of emotion comprehension: TEC. University of Oxford.
Quinn, S., Donnelly, S., & Kidd, E. (2018). The relationship between symbolic play and language acquisition: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 49, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.05.005
Raven, J., Raven, J.K., Cort, J. (2002). Standartnye progressivnye matritsy [Standard progressive matrices]. Translated from English. Kogito-Tsentr.
Ryabkova, I.A., Smirnova, E.O., Sheina, E.G. (2019). Age specifics of role-playing with play tools in preschool children. Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 24(5), 5–15. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2019240501
Smirnova, E.O. (2011a). Psychological and educational evaluation of toys in Moscow Center of Play and Toys. Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie = Psychological Science & Education, 16(2), 5–12. (In Russ.).
Smirnova, E.O. (2011b). Character toys as psychological tools. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2011.570998
Smirnova, E.O., Salmina, N.G., & Tihanova, I.G. (2008). Psychological expertise of a toy. Psikhologicheskaya Nauka i Obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 13(3), 5–19. (In Russ.).
Sung, J. (2018). How Young Children and Their Mothers Experience Two Different Types of Toys: A Traditional Stuffed Toy Versus an Animated Digital Toy. Child and Youth Care Forum, 47(2), 233–257. https://doi: 10.1007/s10566-017-9428-8
Veraksa, A. (2022). Child Development in Russia: Perspectives from an International Longitudinal Study (Vol. 3). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05524-9
Veraksa, A.N., Almazova, O.V., Bukhalenkova, D.A., & Gavrilova, M.N. (2020). The possibility of using role-play to train executive functions in preschoolers. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(1), 111–121. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160111
Veraksa, A.N., Veraksa, N.E. (2021). Interconnection of metacognition and executive functions in childhood: cultural-historical context. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 1, 79–113. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2021.01.04
Veraksa, N.E, Veraksa, A.N, Gavrilova, M.N, Bukhalenkova, D.A, Tarasova, K.S. (2021). The Russian version of the test of emotion comprehension: Adaptation and validation for use in preschool children. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki = Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 18(1), 56–70. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-56-70
Veraksa, N.E. (2022). Dialectical structure of preschool play. Natsional’nyy Psikhologocheskiy Zhurnal = National Psychological Journal, 3(47), 4–12. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2022.0302
Veraksa, N.E., Veresov, N.N., Sukhikh, V.L. (2022). The play matrix: a tool for assessing role-play in early childhood. International Journal of Early Years Education, 30(3), 542–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2022.2025582
Veraksa, N.E., Veresov, N.N., Veraksa, A.N., Sukhikh, V.L. (2020). Modern problems of children’s play: cultural-historical context. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya Psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(3), 60–70. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160307
Vidal Carulla, C., Christodoulakis, N., Adbo, K. (2021). Development of preschool children’s executive functions throughout a play-based learning approach that embeds science concepts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020588
Vygotsky, L.S. (1972). The psychology of art. J. Aesthet. Art Crit., 30, 564–566. https://doi.org/10.2307/429477
Whitebread, D. (2017). Prioritizing Play. EarthEd, August 2016, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-843-5_9
Whitebread, D. (2018). Play: the new renaissance. International Journal of Play, 7(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2018.1532952
Wynberg, E.R., Boland, A., Raijmakers, M.E.J., van der Veen, C. (2022). Towards a Comprehensive View of Object-Oriented Play. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 197–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09608-7
Yudina, E.G. (2022). Pretend play as the territory of freedom. Natsional’nyy Psikhologocheskiy Zhurnal = National Psychological Journal, 3(47), 13–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2022.0303
Zelazo, P.D. (2006). The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): a method of assessing executive function in children. Nat. Protocols, 1, 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.46