Gabdulkhakov V.F., Zinnurova A.F., Sovina A.V. Methodological techniques for the formation of grammatical categories of aspectuality and temporality in the speech of bilingual children of senior preschool age

DOI: 10.24412/2782-4519-2023-1115-12-22

Keywords: methodological techniques grammatical categories aspectuality temporality coherent speech bilingualism older preschool children

To cite this article:

Gabdulkhakov V.F., Zinnurova A.F., Sovina A.V. (2023). Methodological techniques for the formation of grammatical categories of aspectuality and temporality in the speech of bilingual children of senior preschool age. Preschool Education Today. 1:17, 12–22 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2782-4519-2023-1115-12-22

This work is licensed under a Сreative Commons Atribiution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

2023, 1

Antonina V. Sovina
lecturer at the Institute of Psychology and Education of the Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia

Alfiya F. Zinnurova
PhD in Pedagogy, Researcher at the Center of Applied Pedagogy of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, Russia

Valerian F. Gabdulkhakov
Dr. Sci. (Pedagogy), Professor, Institute of psychology and education, Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, Head of the Center of Applied Pedagogy of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, Russian Federation

Abstract

The relevance of the subject of the article is due to the need to form a grammatical structure in older preschoolers in the second language. The grammatical categories of aspectuality and temporality are the most important categories of coherent Russian speech. It is these categories that cause the greatest difficulties for children. We put forward a hypothesis that if, within the framework of literary education of children, we analyze the categories of aspectuality and temporality – draw the attention of preschoolers to the peculiarities of using the aspect ratios of the Russian verb, teach them to correctly reproduce aspect ratios in the process of retelling the text or compiling their story – then the effectiveness of work on the formation of the grammatical structure of Russian speech, the quality of the construction of coherent Russian speech will increase significantly.

The purpose of the article is to show the results of a study on the use of methodological techniques for the formation of grammatical categories of aspectuality and temporality in the Russian speech of bilingual children.

The course of the study. The experimental work was carried out on the basis of kindergartens with the Tatar language of education of the Republic of Tatarstan. In these kindergartens, children learn two languages – Russian and Tatar. At the same time, Tatar is their native language. The experiment took place in 2020-2022. The data obtained were compared with control groups in which work on the categories of aspectuality and temporality was not carried out. The total sample was 334 children of senior preschool age (161 in experimental groups, 173 in control groups). In a pedagogical experiment, we tried to focus children’s attention on the specific features of the Russian verb, to use the identified features when children construct retellings of the text they heard or when constructing their stories in Russian.

The results of the study were positive: there are practically no changes in the number of speech errors in the control groups, in the experimental groups there is a significant decrease (on average by 34%). This proved the effectiveness of methodological techniques for working on the categories of aspectuality and temporality.

Conclusion. The results of the study convince that the work on the development of the grammatical structure in bilingual children in Russian should take into account the typical speech mistakes of older preschoolers: incorrect use of prefixes and suffixes that convey the specific shades of the verb; the use of verbs of the present tense instead of the past; the use of past tense verbs instead of the present; inability to convey the action in the future tense; incorrect inclusion of imperfect verbs view into the content of the narrative about actions in the past tense. In this regard, it is recommended: to use special methodological techniques in the work on the development of speech of older preschoolers: the reception of compositional dismemberment of the narrative structure, the reception of the statement of action in imperfect verbs, the reception of the statement of action in perfect verbs, the reception of compositional reproduction of the narrative structure.

References

Angel De-Juanas O., Rosa Martín del Pozo & Encarnación Pesquero F. (2016). Teaching competences necessary for developing key competences of primary education students in Spain: teacher assessments. Teacher Development. №20:1. 123–145.
Batra P. (2006). Building on the National Curriculum Framework to Enable the Agency of Teachers. Contemporary Education Dialogue. Volume 4. Issue 1. 88–95.
Bhattacharji P., Kingdon G.G. (2020). School Education and the Lack of Parent Information. Contemporary Education Dialogue. Vol. 13 (1). 57–92.
Bocharova M.N. (2004). Funktsional’no-semanticheskie kategorii temporal’nosti i aspektual’nosti v russkom i frantsuzskom yazykakh [Functional-semantic categories of temporality and aspectuality in Russian and French]: Na materiale preterital’nykh form glagola. Dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Volgograd. 197.
Bondarko A.V. (2013). Aspekty analiza glagol’nykh kategorii v sisteme funktsional’noi grammatiki. Glagol’nye i imennye kategorii v sisteme funktsional’noi grammatiki [Aspects of the analysis of verbal categories in the system of functional grammar. Verbal and nominal categories in the system of functional grammar]. Saint Petersburg. 22–26.
Comrie B. (1976). Aspect. An Introduction to the study of verbal aspect and relative problems. Cambridge. 141.
Dierova N.O. (2022). Metodika prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka i literatury [Methods of teaching Russian language and literature]. Uchenyi XXI veka. №1 (82). 42–45.
Drobotenko Yu.B., Makarova N.S., Chekaleva N.V. (2018). Struktura i sposoby otsenivaniya rezul’tatov vysshego pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [Structure and methods of evaluating the results of higher pedagogical education]. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik. №5. 174–182.
Evseenkova K.S. (2019). Lingvostranovedcheskii aspekt v prepodavanii RKI v mladshikh klassakh obshcheobrazovatel’nykh shkol [Linguistic and cultural aspect in teaching Russian as a foreign language in elementary grades of secondary schools]. Sankt-Peterburgskii obrazovatel’nyi vestnik. № 1–2 (29–30). 62–69.
Gabdulkhakov V.F., Khisamova V.N. (2016). Lingvodidaktika polikul’turnogo obrazovaniya [Linguodidactics of multicultural education]. Moscow. Natsional’nyi knizhnyi tsentr Publ. 142.
Ginatulina O.A. (2022). Mezhdistsiplinarnaya svyaz’ v prepodavanii distsiplin: ot summy primerov k problemnomu podkhodu [Interdisciplinary communication in the teaching of disciplines: from the sum of examples to the problematic approach]. Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry. № 1. 174–175.
Glaesser J. (2019). Competence in educational theory and practice: a critical discussion. Oxford Review of Education. №45:1, 70–85.
Gol’berg I.M., Sirenko Yu.S. (2022). Osobennosti izucheniya grammaticheskoi kategorii roda imen sushchestvitel’nykh na fakul’tete nachal’nogo obrazovaniya [Features of the study of the grammatical category of the gender of nouns at the Faculty of Primary Education]. Shkola budushchego. №1. 242–251.
Halliday M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London. 256.
Ibañez B.V. (2017). Sangre y arena. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. 428.
Issers O.S. (2018). Predstavleniya o rechevom ideale, rechevykh prilichiyakh i yazykovom vkuse (po dannym pilotnogo sotsiolingvisticheskogo eksperimenta) [Ideas about the speech ideal, speech decency and language taste (according to the pilot sociolinguistic experiment)]. Kommunikativnye issledovaniya. №4 (18). 95–111.
Johanson L. (1995). On Turkic converb clauses. Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms adverbial participles, gerunds. Empirical approach to language 292 typology, 13. Eds. Haspelmath, M. and König, E. Berlin. New York. 313–347.
Joshi A., Kale S., Chandel S., Pal D.K. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology. Vol. 7. Issue 4. 396–403.
Kurgan L., Musilek P. (2006). A survey of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining process models. The Knowledge Engineering Review. Vol. 21 (1). 1–24.
Lilikovich O.S. (2016). Lingvokognitivnyi i lingvokul’turologicheskii potentsial ispanskikh realii v khudozhestvennom diskurse Eduardo Mendosy [Linguocognitive and linguoculturological potential of Spanish realities in the artistic discourse of Eduardo Mendoza]: avtoref. diss. … k. filol. n. Moscow. 26.
Martinet A. (1975). Studies in functional syntax: …tudes de syntaxe fonctionnelle. Munchen. 275.
Mathesius V. (1961). Obsahov˝ rozbor současne angličtiny na z·kladĕ obečnĕ lingvistickem. Praha. 279.
Rakhmankulova I.-E.S. (2004). K voprosu o teorii aspektual’nosti [To the question of the theory of aspectuality]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya. №1. 3–28.
Regehr G., Martin J., Hutchison C., Murnaghan J., Cusimano M., Reznick R. (1995). The effect of tutors’ content expertise on student learning, group process, and participant satisfaction in a problem‐based learning curriculum. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. №7:4. 225–232.
Ryanskaya E.M. (2002). Sposoby deistviya v kognitivnom aspekte: monografiya [Modes of action in the cognitive aspect: monograph]. Saint Petersburg. RGPU im. A.M. Gertsena. 191.
Schmidt W. (1965). Grundfragen der deutschen Grammatik: Eine Einfurung in die funktionale Sprachlehre. Berlin. 323.
Schmidt W. (1969). Zur Theorie der funktionalen Grammatik. Zeitschrift fur Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung. Bd. 22. 135–151.
Schmidt W. (1982). Zu einigen methodologischen Fragen einer kommunikationsorientieren wissenschaftlichen Sprach- und Textbeschreibung. Semantische und funktionale Beschreibung des Russischen und Deutschen (Linguistische Studien. Reihe A. Arbeitsberichte 99). Berlin. 1–10.
Sgall P., Hajičov· E., Panevov·J. (1986). The meaning of the sentence in its semantic and pragmatic aspects. Prague. 354.
Sgall P., Panevov J. (1976). Obsah, význam a gramatika se sémantickou bází Slovo a slovesnost. Ročn. 37, N 1. 14–25.
Smith A., Taylor J.E. (2017). Essentials of Applied Econometrics. Berkeley, California: Univercity of California Press. 240.
Teoriya funktsional’noi grammatiki (1990) [Functional Grammar Theory]: Temporal’nost’. Modal’nost’. Otv. red. A. V. Bondarko. Leningrad. Nauka Publ. 263.
The CRISP-DM Methodology. PAM Analytics. URL: https: www.pamanalytics.com/downloads/The%20CRISP-DM%20Methodology.pdf (date: 03.03.2022).
Tolstoi L.N. Akula. [Shark. Electronic resource]. URL: https: nukadeti.ru/rasskazy/lev-tolstoj-akula (Date 27.09.2022).
Vendler Z. (1957). Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review 66. 143–160.
Veraksa N.E., Kudryavtsev V.T. (2014). Dialektika razvivayushchegosya poznaniya: myshlenie i voobrazhenie rebenka-doshkol’nika [Dialectics of developing cognition: thinking and imagination of a preschool child]. Vestnik RGPU. Seriya: Psikhologiya, pedagogika, obrazovanie. №20(142). 37–62.
Vorob’ev A.E. (2011). Temporal’naya metafora kak mekhanizm kognitivnogo modelirovaniya deistvitel’nosti (na primere proizvedenii angloyazychnoi khudozhestvennoi literatury) [Temporal Metaphor as a Mechanism of Cognitive Modeling of Reality (on the Example of Works of English Literature)]. Dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Moscow. 195.
Vygotskii L.S. (1982). Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works]. Vol. 2. Moscow. 15–16.
Wheeler S. (2018). The (re)production of (dis) advantage: class-based variations in parental aspirations, strategies and practices in relation to children’s primary education. Education. № 46:7. 3–13.
Zadvornaya M.S., Sheraizina R.M. (2021). Rannee razvitie detei v kontekste sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Early development of children in the context of modern education]. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. №72-2. 84–87.