Bruner J. What We Have Learned about Early Learning
This work is licensed under a Сreative Commons Atribiution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Abstract
In this paper the author explores how our ideas about early learning have developed over time and proposes a new view of pedagogy, that is not based on the traditional Model of Deprivation, but outlines a new model which goes beyond deprivation. The new model proposes that the child is not deprived of culture, rather the child is deprived of opportunities for creating culture and dealing with culture. In this new perspective the child is not viewed as passive but active. The aim of schools should be to provide an “enabling culture” in which the child is involved in reinventing, refurbishing and refreshing the culture. The paper also identifies and explores
3 antinomies which have emerged as ideas about early learning developed;
• the ‘individual realisation’ versus the ‘culture serving’ antinomy
• the ‘talent centred’ versus the ‘tool centred’ antinomy
• the ‘particularism‘ versus the ‘universalism’ antinomy.
It is argued that an exploration of these 3 antinomies can provide a useful basis for thinking about what we have learned about early learning and where we are moving in current development.
The conclusion of this paper is that children from the start must be accepted as members and as participants in the culture and be given the opportunity to make and remake the culture in each generation. The case is made that we should stop thinking about deprivation of children and start thinking about participation of children.
References
1. Barnett, W.S. (1993) Benefit-cost Analysis of Preschool Education: Findings from a 25 Year Follow-up. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63 (4), pp. 500-508.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
3. Brown, A. & Palincsar, A. S. (1989) Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition in: Resnick, L.B. (Ed.) Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, pp. 393-449 (Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum).
4. Brown, A. (1994) The Advancement of Learning, Educational Researcher, 23 (8), pp. 4-12.
5. Bruner, J. (1996) The Culture of Education (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
6. Calvin, W.H. (1983) The Throwing Madonna: From Nervous Cells to Hominid Brains (New York, McGraw-Hill).
7. Clark-Stewart, A. (1982) Day-care. (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
8. Cole, M. & Bruner, J.S. (1971) Cultural Differences and Inferences about Psychological Processes, American Psychologist, 20 (10), pp. 867-876.
9. Derrida, J. (1978) Writing and Difference. (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
10. Harrington, M. (1984) The New American Poverty (New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston).
11. Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. (1994) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. (New York, Free Press).
12. Hunt, J. McV. (1961) Intelligence and Experience. (New York, Ronald Press).
13. Koslowski, B. & Bruner, J.S. (1972) Learning to Use a Lever, Child Development. 43, pp. 790-799.
14. Paley, G. (1992) You Can’t Say You Can’t Play. (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
15. Ribble, M. A. (1944) Infantile Experience in Relation to Personality Development, in: Hunt, J. McV. (Ed.) Personality and the Behavior Disorders. (New York, Ronald Press).
16. Scaife, M. & Bruner, J.S. (1975) The Capacity for Joint Visual Attention in the Infant, Nature, 253, 265-266.
17. Schweinart, L.J. & Weikart, D. P. (1980) Young Children Grow up: The Effects of the Perry Preschool Program on Youths Through Age 15, Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, n ° 7,
18. Stechler, G. & Latz, E. (1966) Some Observations on Attention and Arousal in Human Infant, Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 5, 517-525.
19. Zigler, E. & Valentine, J. (Eds) (1979) Project Head Start: A Legacy of the War on Poverty. (New York, Free Press).