Journal
SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL INCLUDED IN THE LIST
OF THE HIGHER ATTESTATION COMMISSION
UNDER THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
AND SCIENCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
RU EN
ISSN 2782-4519 (Print) 16+
ISSN 2949-5962 (Online)
Search
About
  • About Journal
  • History
  • Indexing
  • Open Access
  • Editorial Ethics and Policy
  • Reviewing
  • Partners
News
Management
  • Editor-in-Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Contacts
Author Center
  • Legal Principles for the Preparation and Publication of Manuscripts
  • Manuscript Submission
  • License Agreement
  • Submit a Manuscript
Issues
  • Volumes
  • All articles
  • Authors
    Journal
    Menu  
    • About
      • About Journal
      • History
      • Indexing
      • Open Access
      • Editorial Ethics and Policy
      • Reviewing
      • Partners
    • News
    • Management
      • Editor-in-Chief
      • Editorial Board
      • Contacts
    • Author Center
      • Legal Principles for the Preparation and Publication of Manuscripts
      • Manuscript Submission
      • License Agreement
      • Submit a Manuscript
    • Issues
      • Volumes
      • All articles
      • Authors
    Journal
    Search
    ISSN 2782-4519 (Print) 16+
    ISSN 2949-5962 (Online)
    • About
      • Назад
      • About
      • About Journal
      • History
      • Indexing
      • Open Access
      • Editorial Ethics and Policy
      • Reviewing
      • Partners
    • News
    • Management
      • Назад
      • Management
      • Editor-in-Chief
      • Editorial Board
      • Contacts
    • Author Center
      • Назад
      • Author Center
      • Legal Principles for the Preparation and Publication of Manuscripts
      • Manuscript Submission
      • License Agreement
      • Submit a Manuscript
    • Issues
      • Назад
      • Issues
      • Volumes
      • All articles
      • Authors
    Moscow, Prospekt Marshala Jukova, d.78, korp.2
    journal@msbook.ru
    MAIN VOLUMES ARTICLES AUTHORS
    • Main
    • Issues
    • All articles
    • All articles
    • Engdahl I., Pramling Samuelsson I., Ärlemalm-Hagsér E. Swedish teachers in the process of implementing education for sustainability in early childhood education

    Engdahl I., Pramling Samuelsson I., Ärlemalm-Hagsér E. Swedish teachers in the process of implementing education for sustainability in early childhood education

    Engdahl I., Pramling Samuelsson I., Ärlemalm-Hagsér E. Swedish teachers in the process of implementing education for sustainability in early childhood education
    Download PDF
    Keywords: early childhood teachers education for sustainability (EfS) early childhood education for sustainability (ECEfS) critical theory sustainable development transformative education research and development program (R&D program)
    To cite this article:
    Engdahl I., Pramling Samuelsson I., Ärlemalm-Hagsér E. (2022) Swedish teachers in the process of implementing education for sustainability in early childhood education. Preschool Education Today. 5:16, 66–80. (in Russian)

    This work is licensed under a Сreative Commons Atribiution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

    2022, 5
    Ingrid Engdahl
    Stockholm University, Department of Child and Youth Studies, Stockholm, Sweden

    Eva Ärlemalm-Hagsér
    Mälardalen Uni­ver­sity, School of Education, Culture, and Communication, Västerås, Sweden

    Abstract

    Background. We are living in challenging times, with an urgent need for transformation that requires new and sustainable ways of living. Young children are exposed to these global challenges. This study responds to the need for further understanding of how education for sustainability (EfS) is being handled in early childhood education (ECE).

    Objective. This study investigated ECE teachers in the process of implementing early childhood education for sustainability (ECEfS). This was initiated by the 2019 revised Swedish National Curriculum for the preschool, where education for sustainable development is included as an overall value and objective.

    Design of study. The data presented in this article was obtained in May 2021. An initial questionnaire was emailed to all Ifous participants. One hundred fifty-three teachers (76.5%) responded. The intention of the questionnaire was twofold: first, to investigate what the teachers considered to be education for sustainability in ECE; and second, to scrutinize the teachers’ knowledge base, for the further planning of the research and development program. Content analysis was used to analyze the data.

    Results. The findings of the study showed a tendency to describe education for sustainability as “business-as-usual” rather than treating EfS as a new field, and to contend that the teachers addressed EfS before it became a compulsory task in 2019. There were few connections made to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (2015) and to the ongoing pandemic. A common trend when describing the content and activities was to divide the content into three areas, following the three dimensions of sustainability. The teachers described the physical changes and pedagogical changes made after the revision of the national curriculum.

    Conclusion. The teachers in the study were interested in EfS, and some articulated a longing for more knowledge about ECEfS and for transformative change. The teachers also showed the need for courage and professionalism to lead the way in finding the relevant content and activities for EfS. The teachers were struggling to find new ways to meet the demands from the governing documents especially during a planetary crisis.

    Current View
    Current View

    Enter the password to open this PDF file:

    File name:

    -

    File size:

    -

    Title:

    -

    Author:

    -

    Subject:

    -

    Keywords:

    -

    Creation Date:

    -

    Modification Date:

    -

    Creator:

    -

    PDF Producer:

    -

    PDF Version:

    -

    Page Count:

    -

    Preparing document for printing...
    0%

    References

    1. Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. SAGE.
    2. Åkerblom, A., Hellman, A., & Pramling, N. (2020). Metodologi – för studier i, om och med förskolan.Gleerups.
    3. Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E. (2013). Engagerade för världens bästa? Lärande för hållbarhet i förskolan (Doktorsavhandling, Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences 335). Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
    4. Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E. (2014). Parti­cipation as ‘Taking Part In’: Education for sustainability in Swedish preschools. Global Studies of Childhood, 4(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2014.4.2.101
    5. Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E., & Sundberg, B. (2016). Nature experiences and recycling: A quantitative study on education for sustainable development in Swedish preschools. NorDiNa, 12(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.1107
    6. Bascopé, M., Perasso, P., & Reiss, K. (2019). Systematic review of education for sustainable development at an early stage: Cornerstones and pedagogical approaches for teacher professional development. Sustainability, 11, 719–735. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030719
    7. Boldermo, S., & Eriksen Ødegaard, E. (2019). What about the migrant children? The state-of-the-art in research claiming social sustainability. Sustainability, 11, 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1765089
    8. Borg, F. (2017). Caring for people and the planet: Preschool children’s knowledge and practices of sustainability. (Doctoral thesis). Umeå University.
    9. Borg, F., & Gericke, N. (2021). Local and global aspects: Teaching social sustainability in Swedish preschools. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3838. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073838
    10. Borg, F., & Pramling Samuelsson, I. (in press). Preschool children’s agency in education for sustainability: The case of Sweden. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal.
    11. Christensen, M. (2021). Children’s understandings of sustainability-related topics and issues: A phenomenographic investigation seen through drawings and interviews with 6-8-year-old children. (Doctoral thesis). Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, AUS.
    12. Davis, J. (2009). Revealing the research ‘hole’ of early childhood education for sustainability: A preliminary survey of the literature. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802710607
    13. Davis. J., & Elliott, S. (2014). Research in early childhood education for sustainability: International perspectives and provocations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767499
    14. Elliott, S., & Davis, J. (2009). ‘Exploring the resistance: An Australian perspective on educating for sustainability in early childhood’. International Journal of Early Childhood, 41(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168879
    15. Elliott, E., Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E., & Davis, J. (2020). Researching early childhood education for sustainability: Challenging assumptions and orthodoxies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429446764
    16. Engdahl, I. (2015). Early childhood education for sustainability: The OMEP world project. International Journal of Early Childhood, 47, 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-015-0149-6
    17. Emilson, A. (2008). Det önskvärda barnet: Fostran uttryckt i vardagliga kommunikationshandlingar mellan lärare och barn i förskola. (Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, 284.) Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
    18. Forsberg, B. (2002). Lokal Agenda 21 för hållbar utveckling: En studie av miljöfrågan i tillväxtsamhället (Doctoral thesis). Umeå University.
    19. Furu, A-C., & Heilala, C. (2021). Sustainability education in progress: Practices and pedagogies in Finnish early childhood education and care teaching practice settings. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 8(2), 16-28.
    20. Fröbel, F. (1995[1863]). Människans fostran. (Bearbetad av Jan-Erik Johansson.) Studentlitteratur.
    21. Green, C. J. (2015). Toward young children as active researchers: A critical review of the methodologies and methods in early childhood environmental education. International Joutrnal of Environmental Education, 46(4), 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1050345
    22. Hedefalk, M., Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2015). Education for sustainable development in early childhood education: A review of the research literature. Environmental Education Research, 21, 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.971716
    23. Ifous. (2021). Plan för forskning- och utvecklingsprogrammet: Hållbar förskola. [Plan for the research and development programme: Sustainable preschool]. Ifous.
    24. Jickling, B. (2017). Education revisited: Creating educational experiences that are held, felt and disruptive. In B. Jickling, & S. Sterling (Eds.), Post-sustainability and environmental education: Remaking education for the future (pp. 15–30). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5_2
    25. Jickling, B., & Sterling, S. (2017). Post-sustainability and environmental education: Framing issues. In B. Jickling, & S. Sterling (Eds.), Post-sustainability and environmental education: Remaking education for the future (pp.1-11). Palmgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5
    26. Kopnina, H. (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1710444
    27. National Agency for Education. (2019). Curriculum for the preschool Lpfö18. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationer?id=4049
    28. Siraj-Blatchford, J., Mogharreban, C., & Park, E. (Eds.). International research on education for sustainable development in early childhood. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42208-4
    29. Somerville, M. T., & Williams, C. (2015). Sustainability education in early childhood: An updated review of research in the field. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949115585658
    30. OMEP (World Organization for Early Childhood Education). (2019b). The OMEP ESD rating scale (2 ed.). http://www.omepworld.org
    31. United Nations [UN]. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. General assembly. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
    32. United Nations [UN]. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN General assembly. https://doi.org/10.18356/84e5e905-en
    33. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural organization [UNESCO]. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
    34. Uppsala University. (2021). Codex rules and guidelines for research. https://codex.uu.se/
    35. Vaealiki, S., & Mackey, G. (2008) ‘Ripples of action: Strengthening environmental competency in an early childhood centre’. NZCER Early Childhood Folio, 12, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.18296/ecf.0193
    36. Višnjić-Jevtić, A., Sadownik, A., & Engdahl, I. (2021). Young children in the world and their rights: Thirty years with the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68241-5
    Выберите один из подарков
    Выберите один из товаров, чтобы получить подарок
    Journal "Preschool Education Today"
    © 2007 - 2024. Active link en.sdo-journal.ru required.
    User agreement

    ABOUT
    ABOUT
    About
    Editorial Board
    News
    Contacts
    ISSUES
    ISSUES
    All articles
    Volumes
    Authors
    AUTHOR CENTER
    AUTHOR CENTER
    For Authors